It is all the opposite is happening today

It was too complicated. Finally, the wealth tax will survive. And if the tax shield disappears, it will be replaced by a ceiling. Cleaning of the taxation of heritage promised by the President of the Republic three months ago has volatilized under the pressure of lobbies, the resistance of the parliamentarians and scholars calculations of experts from Bercy. In other words, the system will become next year even more complicated. And this is not finished, because it is likely that the next President, left or right, be held to reform him also that tax stupid without having the courage or energy to reform.

The journalist would have bad grace of complain. It is beautiful titles in the clashes to tell, clicks on the Internet. But otherwise all the citizen, the taxpayer, the Patriot. Because the State spends his time to organize the mess. Normally, in a world that moves more quickly, where the obsession with short-term hunting the long-term vision, the public action should calm, provide benchmarks, broaden the horizon. It is all the opposite is happening today. The State creates volatility, the volatility it intends also to root out financial markets.

The evidence by three examples. First, the labour market. Nearly 900,000 men and women working in the public service as "non-incumbent", 16 of the total. To speak clear, they are fixed-term contract. Ultimately, poverty affects more public sector than the private sector, where "only" 12 of employees are in precarious conditions (CSD, acting, internships). It is the inevitable counterweight of a Labour Organization completely frozen from officials. Each have the job for life, the other volatility to life.

Second example: tax, therefore. In its report "Cards on the table 2011" published last week, the Medef gives staggering numbers: "the business tax was amended 68 times since 1975, the research tax credit 24 times since 1982, the taxation of capital gains on shares of individuals 10 times since 1989.". The excitement does not stop there. To resume the ISF, it was created in 1989, capped at 70 (tax on the revenue and ISF should not exceed that proportion of the income) and then at 85, then the CAP was removed in 1995, and then recreated by the shield to 60 in 2006 and 50 in 2007, the all accompanied with constant changes of the taxable base. The scale of the income, tax changed in 1994, 1997, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2007 and 2011. Instead of being a garden à la française, our taxation is a sea turbulent unpredictable waves. Station to the stroller, which can be carried away by a blade.

Third example: solar energy. To encourage the growth of this green electricity, the State decided to subsidize the. Solar kWh from panels integrated into buildings (roofs, etc.) should be purchased by EDF 60 cents (while the individual pays its kWh less than 12 cents). On 1 January 2010, the price was lowered to 42 cents. September 1, he moved to 37 cents. And at the end of the year, was decreed a moratorium of three months for new projects...

These three examples all have the same result: the action of the State creates fog instead of reducing it. Nearly one million employees live in fear of the next contract that may wish to sign - or not - his public employer. Millions of taxpayers do not know what sauce they will eat tomorrow. Hundreds of companies cancel their project of solar equipment, compromising the emergence of a real stream for which the France had yet of real assets. Even if every action, every decision, every change can be justified by an excellent reason, their flow is unjustifiable. The French have choice of resignation. Otherwise for foreigners who want to invest in France: they invariably cite the unpredictability of public action as one of the main barriers to their France projects. It is urgent to put an end to the Brownian motion. To enact the moratorium of the microchangements. To return to a State strategist.